After World War 2 a "New World Order" was ushered into the 20th century, one that had to redistribute not only wealth , but global thinking. The old way was based on archaic sub-standard economic and social systems that had outlived their usefulness. With the awesome development of miraculous technologies from the outcome of world war 2, a brave new world was hatched underneath an unsuspecting world populous. Before , the center stage of this world had been lumped into either neo-conservative or neo-liberal views of economics or social systems. Neo-conservative views represented very paternalistic states often with a very militaristic edge that encouraged the industrial age, colonialism in the old mercantilism era. Brutal wars often occurred in these regimes. Neo-liberalism preferred to recruit super large and expensive social programs via a pragmatic approach to advance progressivism. Social changes in these neo-liberal periods proved not easy as "old guard and ideas" preferred to encumber advancements of certain sectors of the population expecting progress. These periods saw "class warfare" with civil war. Communism, socialism, populism grew out from these movements. Unlike a paternalistic state a social welfare program and one based on public service, public works all predominantly state run was it's mainstay. But, both systems couldn't continue to battle every few election years.
UNITY IS BETTER: By the late 20th Century we would see neo-conservatives hatch groups like PNAC(project for the New American Century) while Neo-Liberalism become dove-tailed by the New America Foundation . Post-World War 2 saw a boom in new orders of socialism come about with several governments. Russia's Leninist-Marxist form of communism followed as being a very repressive order that rapidly brutalized its subjects and reducing their population by 100 million. This form of centralized communism repressed people socially through the military and secret police (KGB). It also forced migration to urban centers and "co-opting" privately individual farms for community work was rampant. The old Soviet-style of government totalitarian rule saw to it through its 5 year programs to pre-plan what would happen for its future economy and labor force. On the other side of this communism was the Maoist-Kerensky type of communism. In China which adopted this the best, the population was "controlled" rather than reduced with a "One Child" per family order that still stands. A more powerful elite rules while agrarian communities serve the urban power elite to sustain its power. A well organized structure that was already in place from previous Imperial orders made the transition quick and simple once Chiang Kiachek was ousted. But, other forms of socialism exists in Europe. Most of Europe are Social Democratic nations(socialism) whether they be Germany, France, Spain or Italy and to a great degree so is the United Kingdom. Americans do not realize nor study this fact that socialism is already in place with our European allies. Programs like the European community, Euro Zone and European Union were created to make this very surreptitious transition to socialism. NAFTA, GATT, TPP, WTO are all similar programs that are making globalism's transition into Neo-socialism possible. Gone are the ages of Monarchies, imperialisms, fascism, oligarchies and colonialism. No one individual or class of group rules over another in our modern day "capitalism" - free market system or so it would seem. The abuse of power of creating implicit indentured servitude into horrendous debt ridden populations that are dependent on social programs still exists today much of it through many regional wars and banking collapses. But, what if there was a "New" order that had just parts and pieces of these "old orders" enough to make a pernicious assiduous transition that wouldn't threaten the veneer of there being a radical "coup" of ideas, implanted into all social systems, economic systems and an individuals daily life?
No comments:
Post a Comment