Neo-Socialism 101: Necessary for a New World Order?

Our world's sustainability is quickly becoming less assured as to whether it can continue to support biological life for the next century, but what can be done to assure our existence? As mentioned in the previous article numerous sociological, political and economic systems have been implemented usually through wars or after collapsed economic systems have all but too often failed. What we have shaping place now is a systematic "Chimera" called Neo-Socialism. Neo-Socialism is that Chimera that satisfies many different schools of thought and ideas of previous systems patched together with a new idealism. Neo-Socialism has a little bit for everyone's system. It has a sprinkling of capitalism, a dash of totalitarianism, a splash of oligarichal-corporatism, and a even a little dose of militarism. But, what is now different with today's "new order" of Neo-Socialism is that it is being ushered in under the cloak of super-technologies never imagined before. It is digital technology with the microchip and bio-genetic technology that are at the crux of the new century's new system because they are what steers the next real steps in "change" on the planet globally. Three areas must be obtained to realize this metamorphosis. One step has already happened, that of destabilizing the current global economic, financial and banking systems by obliterating the fiat currency exchange. Afterwards re-creating replacing it with a new currency exchange that is built on digital and microchip technology will be legitimately instituted. Digital banking tracks all users through consumer resources in virtual real time . The computer databases' ability to predict shortages of resources or potential financial sector activity can be monitored more tightly. Secondly is to control the worlds overall biology through genetic(DNA) patent rights which we have already with GMO(genetically modified organisms) been imposed by corporation rights to own life . That means plant, animal and yes, human biology will be owned by the new system. A new era of trans-humanism is already a very close possibility as we create bionic eyes, arms and legs that sense neurologically just like the natural original human part. Micro-computers will allow humans to interface with super-databases(via hand held devices, car, clothing, exercise devices, medical devices, social-entertainment devices etc..) these devices themselves are connected to super-computers. The biology of a human being connected to micro-chips will allow the system to detect one's metabolic and molecular activity as a unit of real measurable data to predict use, waste or benefit for system utility . The third part of the transition to Neo-Socialism is to co-op the worlds military so that it can oversee the energy, mineral, aquatic and agricultural supplies which can be further managed. All distribution of resources: water, air, land, crops, and industrial lands will be securely regulated by extremely accurate computer measures .Energy, the most important, will be both rationed and controlled as sky-rocketd prices will determine who has access in the markets. The regional wars beyond Syria, China's recent aggression on disputed islands in both the South and East China Seas along with Russia's grab for the Crimea and Ukraine represent a greater agenda beyond sovereignties vying for power, but rather diverts our attention from

the actual "greater game", Neo-Socialism.

Neo-Socialism Part 1: Standing Independent From Neo-Conservatism and Neo-Liberalism

After World War 2 a "New World Order" was ushered into the 20th century, one that had to redistribute not only wealth , but global thinking. The old way was based on archaic sub-standard economic and social systems that had outlived their usefulness. With the awesome development of miraculous technologies from the outcome of world war 2, a brave new world was hatched underneath an unsuspecting world populous. Before , the center stage of this world had been lumped into either neo-conservative or neo-liberal views of economics or social systems. Neo-conservative views represented very paternalistic states often with a very militaristic edge that encouraged the industrial age, colonialism in the old mercantilism era. Brutal wars often occurred in these regimes. Neo-liberalism preferred to recruit super large and expensive social programs via a pragmatic approach to advance progressivism. Social changes in these neo-liberal periods proved not easy as "old guard and ideas" preferred to encumber advancements of certain sectors of the population expecting progress. These periods saw "class warfare" with civil war. Communism, socialism, populism grew out from these movements. Unlike a paternalistic state a social welfare program and one based on public service, public works all predominantly state run was it's mainstay. But, both systems couldn't continue to battle every few election years. UNITY IS BETTER: By the late 20th Century we would see neo-conservatives hatch groups like PNAC(project for the New American Century) while Neo-Liberalism become dove-tailed by the New America Foundation . Post-World War 2 saw a boom in new orders of socialism come about with several governments. Russia's Leninist-Marxist form of communism followed as being a very repressive order that rapidly brutalized its subjects and reducing their population by 100 million. This form of centralized communism repressed people socially through the military and secret police (KGB). It also forced migration to urban centers and "co-opting" privately individual farms for community work was rampant. The old Soviet-style of government totalitarian rule saw to it through its 5 year programs to pre-plan what would happen for its future economy and labor force. On the other side of this communism was the Maoist-Kerensky type of communism. In China which adopted this the best, the population was "controlled" rather than reduced with a "One Child" per family order that still stands. A more powerful elite rules while agrarian communities serve the urban power elite to sustain its power. A well organized structure that was already in place from previous Imperial orders made the transition quick and simple once Chiang Kiachek was ousted. But, other forms of socialism exists in Europe. Most of Europe are Social Democratic nations(socialism) whether they be Germany, France, Spain or Italy and to a great degree so is the United Kingdom. Americans do not realize nor study this fact that socialism is already in place with our European allies. Programs like the European community, Euro Zone and European Union were created to make this very surreptitious transition to socialism. NAFTA, GATT, TPP, WTO are all similar programs that are making globalism's transition into Neo-socialism possible. Gone are the ages of Monarchies, imperialisms, fascism, oligarchies and colonialism. No one individual or class of group rules over another in our modern day "capitalism" - free market system or so it would seem. The abuse of power of creating implicit indentured servitude into horrendous debt ridden populations that are dependent on social programs still exists today much of it through many regional wars and banking collapses. But, what if there was a "New" order that had just parts and pieces of these "old orders" enough to make a pernicious assiduous transition that wouldn't threaten the veneer of there being a radical "coup" of ideas, implanted into all social systems, economic systems and an individuals daily life?

Hope & Tragedy: Capitalism's Fianl Appeal For Neo-Socialism

It has been written through the pangs of revolutionary ideas and movements that activist such as Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry , Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin forged the ideas for the "Rights of Man". It was hammered out in documents known as the American Constitution, the Bill of Rights and The Declaration of Independence. It was such a "best seller" that the French adopted their movement based upon it. Through civil wars and civil rights our country and the world has changed. With the transformation of the world through two world wars , the idea of globalism would be hatched via the League of Nations which was reborn as the United Nations. New thinkers such as George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Carroll Quigley and Ayn Rand would write about the "transformation of man" in a format that would be commercially digestible in novels( (1984, a Brave New World, Hope & Tragedy, and Atlas Shrugged) that all seemed to foretell and anticipate the future of what was coming down the pike. The United Nations studies had already predicted that the world population growing exponentially would bring about the worst scenarios of a world in chaotic non-sustainability. Bottom line , critical mass for the "world population bomb" was predicted going off in the latter part of the 20th century. Capitalism run by a fiat currency would not sustain itself any further without going over a cliff . Over-printing and devaluation of money acts only as a legal Ponzi scheme to slow down the disaster as revealed by the 2008 market crash that precipitated the U.S. housing crash, and the global economic recession. A new economy would have to be developed to accommodate the masses to enter into today's growing Neo-Socialism . Technologies that are friendly and daily useful will have to become intimately tied to the global economy (Neo-Socialism)of the future for survival as it has already begun. These realities arise quickly on the heels of what may cause the next global economic crisis via technology, it's called High Frequency Trading of securities and stocks. High Frequency Traders(HFT) have created a scheme to trade Americans retirement funds on the stock exchange if they can anticipate where their funds will be invested so that they can be charged a higher rate for the trade within fractions of seconds . Yes, the digital world is a "hope", but HFT shows that it could be a tragedy used in the wrong hands the wrong way. In a digital world computers and robots can replace human labor , replace brick and mortar businesses , voter elections can be hijacked and human interactions become less which can affect human relations. As we become more impersonal with one another in a digital world, employment begins to slip. Artificial Intelligence will have to become a daily tool to "fill in the gap" for the economy for what will become the greatest "human revolution" for all mankind....A New World Order" that can bring every human being in line with a new "radical economics"(as stated by Pope Francis), now known as Neo-Socialism. A system that interlaces technology that can monitor every activity of a person and their consumption of products . This is done by making one's most guarded personal rights become a logistical monitored unit of a governmental state or corporation , one's biological-health. Health(an individuals private biological data regarding health, insurance, medicines, cancer risks, pre-existing conditions, food preferences, family history, health and drugs stores one purchases at) will become (as it already is) a publicly traded stock between corporations. But unfortunately the Millennial generation nor "generation X" will know what will be coming d

own the pike, because most do not read the news, history or current events.. But, at this rate their ambush of real education may be in effect enabling the necessity of a digital world that will control most aspects of their very being. The future is Today.

World War 3 Assured? Thermonuclear v. Protracted Conventional

In George Orwell's famous science fiction novel 1984 the concept of perpetual war or "war without end" is established as a permanent industry that employs all for the common good. "Double Speak" was a controlled propaganda machine that not only manipulated the masses by re-writing history, but also by omitting current events. Flash forward where the mainstream media knows that the biggest story it's sitting on top of is the social, civil and geo-political unrest in the Ukraine, but it would seem less likely when we sit down at "6 and 10". What has been developing in the last two to three weeks is that over 150,000 Russian troops have secured the border of southeast Ukraine while "stirring up" internal support within Ukraine. The first Ukraine soldier , an officer, was allegedly shot by Russians and Black Sea Russian naval boats have proceeded to sail into the area unchallenged as Turkish NATO forces look on. Secretary of State John Kerry has spoken to his Russian counterpart(Lavrov) and it appears an unavoidable battle is eminent. This all occurs after a referendum of Crimean citizens voted to be annexed by Russia, a NATO supported embargo on Russia, and military support being sent to Poland by western forces. After all this, it appears the end is no closer in sight as a new referendum is being proposed by pro-Russian factions within Ukraine as well. These events have all occurred on the heels of a nuclear summit held by western forces . In a press conference, the U.S. president stated , however, there was more concern for a nuclear device going off in Manhattan rather than global thermonuclear war. Many New Yorkers are still not breathing any easier after that remark. The Russian Federation was described during that summit as being just merely a "regional player" on the world stage. The leaders of the U.S., President Obama, Germany's Chancellor Merkel and Britain's Prime Minister, Cameron were all placed in a simulation of a nuclear threat situation similar to a war game scenario. The British and German leaders felt very uneasy and out of place in their contingency responses it was reported. So, what does that mean? It not only questions readiness , it is a de facto confirmation where we are headed in the world as things heat up and western forces get prepared. Just recently, North Korea fired another Inter-continental ballistic test missile(Rodong class) with a range of 650 kilometers which triggered Japan to place naval destroyer gun boats to intercept any further demonstrations by the defiant nation. Russian hegemony appears to be more difficult to contain as the world waits with the breakdown of diplomatic communications in the face of losing Ukrainian sovereignty. The diplomatic and economic responses may prove too

little and too late.