Neo-Socialism : A Concept Whose Time Has Come, Part 3

Neo-Socialism is based on the theory of "equal distribution of both services, labor, cost and product(goods)". That is the basic necessities of life would have to be guaranteed as long as an individual signs on to the global project in a means to benefit the "greater" good of all humanity. When "weight" is equally distributed on an ocean liner, all points of the vessel have to be displaced equally by the pressure of weight , regardless if you are a point in first, 2nd or 3rd class, everyone is all attributing the same effort(work applied to maintain balance to avoid capsizing) to staying afloat on a sinking ship . And it applies that if the same ocean liner goes down, everyone will go down with the ship unless there is help provided for all "classes" to be rescued. The rushing water doesn't distinguish between first class, 2nd class and 3rd class passengers nor how luxurious your cabin is. The world's current economy maybe conceived just like the Titanic ocean liner where we've divided all people based on the false idea someone's worth and value is based on what you've amassed materially in life. Neo-socialism's advanced paradigm shift evolves away from this and eliminates the façade that any part of humanity is better than any other sector based only merely on a materialistic basis. But, rather it ushers in such a new dynamic shift in the economic concept , however , getting human beings to accept this is another challenge altogether. How do you bring people to a new equalized and fair socio-economic basis without "rocking the boat" or without appearing to be bringing another section of people "down" to a universal equalized level? Also, how do you avoid making those who are already "higher up" too much further up the ladder? How do you avoid creating a greater divide or gap between "haves" and "have nots" . Economic systems can not evolve entirely as a new system purely by economic tools and instruments alone by fashioning the markets and commercialization because there has to be as much of a social change in the overall system to be equally effective in bringing about change throughout all society. The world's next paradigm, that is slowly being trickled down is one that will call for this sort of "equalization" of our over-all socio-economic factors for every single individual on the planet. It will and is thus, the biggest project ever the human race has participated in for one effort of survival of this planet(it is actually occurring daily, but not adequately reported or either just piecemeal-like only). It will be a massive program larger than the combined U.S. Social Security insurance, along with the largest logistics of utilizing all natural disaster relief budgets by the UN?UNCHR and all the budgets for past and current wars prosecuted in the last century together. It will need to be bigger than previous Lend Lease post-war programs during post-World War 2, larger than the all budgets of governments that have received Stimulus programs in the U.S., Europe and Japan and by all central and international banks . Neo-socialism will have to be greater than the rebuild of Europe after WW2 and the rebuild of Japan and China in the same period.The effort will be even greater logistically and monetarirly than all the bailouts of the current U.S.A., Europe and Asia. It will have to be logistically and financially supported greater than the world wide war on terrorism backed by multi-international national efforts. In effect , New-Socialism's new paradigm will seek to create a new currency between humans that may not be at all material via technology! Because it will transcend material wealth as we know it to rebuild the world. Just off the top, corporations appear to be in the best place that can catalyze this type of change by those commanded by government policy, just as corporations stopped in World War 2 in making commercial airplanes and cars and started making B 52s and tanks for the world war effort. At that time corporations and manufacturers decided they would now make uniforms instead of designer clothes. Foods would have to be utilized at lower rates and rationed for those who were on the battlefield. Conserving energy, oil, gas, electricity and sharing in those resources were necessary for "the greater good" of the war effort. Why not utilize this same concept and effort for peace and economy. Now, do you recently remember that the television manufacturers stated they would discontinue making "old" anode" style teleivisions even if you had one that worked perfectly well or was even brand new. The "system" was going to change to HD models with cameras built into them and 1000 channels from satellite . The FCC(national government) would support this, but even if this was the case a Stimulus package" would have to be built-in for makers to make all those new expensive HD t.v. units for the loss of revenue on new expensive purchases that were not going to be bought due to low economy and higher expense of them. It is the same for the new battery operated and flex-fueled cars that are being built . But, to build one of those cars is about $100,000. However, the only way to bring those prices down would be to give a bailout or stimulus package to the car manufacturers so they can begin to produce the cars and sell them at a lower rate to consumers. Most U.S. companies took the stimulus package and our companies have become "nationalized"(socialized) on the record, the government owns them officially. It is the same with housing. Governments can effect these economic policies of "stimulus" or "bailouts" for the corporations high cost of production and anticipated loss of revenue. Notice that we haven't seen the same abrupt mandated policy to change carbon fuel based automobiles to these new fuel types like we did with the anode T.V.s. Why? because the average car cost is between $28,000 to $100,000 USD ; unlike an average t.v. costing between $500 to $2000 USD. Mandating the industry only makes these alternative fuel model vehicles like what we did for televisions would abruptly rock the economy sector too much , too fast. Instead we will see these new car models with new fuel concepts "trickle" into society as old fossil fuel ones will just simply disappear because they will no longer be produced and fuels will not support them. Just, what does this have to do with the idea of Neo-Socialism? It shows the concept of how the goals of the corporations will gladly merge into governments economic policies creating a new cooperative partnership between corporations and government making many of these shifts and changes possible. Whether it is televisions, cars, housing or education institutions having to have digital technology in schools and being financed by corporations, or privately owned prisons; this new government and corporative partnership will meld into a "Corporatocracy" . This seems to be the most important ingredient into forming an oligharichal-corporatocracy , true. But, the new economics will be based on human social behavior as much as it will be on financial matters. More importantly it will be digital corporations making many of the old policies that were once government decisions made by the congress. Newer produced jobs based on high tech micro-computers will replace many things that were done manually by humans. Technology will open up new fields of studies with new ranges and new occupations and professions will take shape and change how we will integrate science , technology, and social-economics to that of our own biology(by AI/bionics). Money as we define it today as being an exchange duly noted on paper for labor already performed so that it can therefore be traded , exchanged or purchased on a market, shall itself change as digital money will become common place. Money that is on a micro-chip/digital (bitcoin) can be scanned in real time instead of held up at the bank for 2 or 3 days. it means the individual will have access automatically , but so will the new system that connects banking systems, health care systems computer data bases to your phone, credit card, hotel, school and entertainment . The question we will have in the early 21st century is whether we should keep the micro-chip external to the human body or internalize it. As time passes situations and circumstances will reveal the convenience and assiduous uses of such a novel device to be involved in everything we engage in on a daily basis. Payments of items such as pharmaceuticals, blood check, your doctors laboratory and clinic visit, your heart rate, number of calories you eat, how hot your body got with what food, how much elimination molecules of CO2 , methane gas your body makes, how much energy your body stores in summer and winter will now all be accessible , pre-caluclated and predetermined its cost/benefit ratio to the society as a whole via the system's intelligence computers and smart devices. This new economic system and new technology culture will become "the program" and will essentially have to be world-wide. The world will be in a new age that will introduce and be accepting of AI(artificial intelligence) by that time. From that point on the human digital divide will grow closer and as the world seems smaller, and now we will get perhaps one of the most precise states of "Neo-Socialism". If organizations such as the W.T.0(World Trade Organization), GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA, EU, BRICS, TPP, ASEAN and others were merely precursors to creating a "global village", then it would make sense that they were also the precursors to "Neo-Socialism". Just because these early forms of it were given multiple names for it, they still are all under the umbrella of the Free Trade Agreement which is all necessary to usher in "Neo-Socialism". Some, such the Presidential Candidate Ross Perot preferred to call this the "giant sucking sound" that was going out of one particular country to basically equalize all economies of the world in a system of artificial parity. In this policy we have the new world system that will be further developed and enforce a new high technology the likes of which the world has never seen , it will be a marvel, magical,but may take mayhem to introduce, initiate it, maintain and sustain it.